Table 2.9.A. Consumption of Petroleum Liquids for Electricity Generation by State, by Sector, |
March 2025 and March 2024 (Thousand Barrels) |
Electric Power Sector | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Census Division and State |
All Sectors | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers | Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||
March 2025 | March 2024 | Percentage Change | March 2025 | March 2024 | March 2025 | March 2024 | March 2025 | March 2024 | March 2025 | March 2024 | |
New England | 24 | 21 | 12% | NM | 2 | 18 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0.44 |
Connecticut | 13 | 10 | 32% | NM | 1 | 12 | 9 | NM | NM | 0.35 | 0.06 |
Maine | 1 | 1 | 69% | 0 | 0 | NM | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.37 |
Massachusetts | 5 | 7 | -21% | NM | NM | NM | 4 | 1 | 1 | NM | NM |
New Hampshire | 3 | 2 | 31% | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Rhode Island | NM | 1 | NM | 0.02 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 |
Vermont | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Middle Atlantic | 48 | 38 | 27% | 9 | 9 | NM | 22 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
New Jersey | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
New York | 31 | 28 | 8.6% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 16 | NM | NM | 1 | 1 |
Pennsylvania | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
East North Central | 67 | 64 | 4.1% | 45 | 44 | 22 | 17 | NM | 0.15 | NM | 3 |
Illinois | 4 | 4 | 23% | NM | 1 | 3 | 3 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
Indiana | 20 | 9 | 126% | 19 | 9 | NM | 0 | 0.00 | 0.02 | NM | 0.03 |
Michigan | 14 | 22 | -37% | 14 | 22 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
Ohio | 20 | 17 | 18% | NM | 1 | 17 | 15 | NM | NM | NM | 1 |
Wisconsin | NM | 14 | NM | NM | 12 | 0 | 0.04 | NM | NM | NM | 2 |
West North Central | 73 | 79 | -7.8% | 73 | 79 | NM | NM | NM | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
Iowa | 9 | 9 | -2.7% | 9 | 9 | NM | NM | 0.00 | 0.00 | NM | NM |
Kansas | 20 | NM | NM | 20 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Minnesota | NM | 10 | NM | NM | 10 | NM | NM | NM | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
Missouri | 24 | 21 | 9.6% | 24 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
Nebraska | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
North Dakota | 5 | 11 | -54% | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
South Dakota | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0.01 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
South Atlantic | 168 | 135 | 25% | 125 | 101 | 29 | NM | NM | 8 | 13 | 10 |
Delaware | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
District of Columbia | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
Florida | 30 | NM | NM | 29 | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 0.26 |
Georgia | 21 | 14 | 57% | 9 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 11 | 7 |
Maryland | 22 | 8 | 166% | 5 | 0.14 | 17 | 8 | 0.16 | NM | 0 | 0 |
North Carolina | 13 | 46 | -73% | 11 | 45 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 1 | NM |
South Carolina | 9 | NM | NM | 8 | NM | NM | NM | 0.04 | NM | 0.37 | 2 |
Virginia | 39 | 20 | 96% | 30 | NM | 8 | NM | 0.01 | 8 | 1 | NM |
West Virginia | 32 | 17 | 92% | 32 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East South Central | 29 | 20 | 50% | 27 | 18 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Alabama | 3 | NM | NM | 2 | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 2 | NM |
Kentucky | 6 | 5 | 24% | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mississippi | 2 | 3 | -40% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.42 | 0.05 |
Tennessee | 18 | 10 | 74% | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
West South Central | 67 | NM | NM | 35 | 31 | 31 | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 0.50 |
Arkansas | 6 | 6 | -6.8% | 6 | 6 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
Louisiana | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oklahoma | 9 | NM | NM | 9 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.41 | 0.24 |
Texas | 51 | NM | NM | 20 | 21 | 31 | NM | NM | NM | 0.23 | 0.25 |
Mountain | 59 | 62 | -5.7% | 58 | 58 | 1 | 4 | NM | NM | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Arizona | 4 | 2 | 103% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
Colorado | 29 | 34 | -14% | 29 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Idaho | 0 | 0.03 | -100% | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Montana | NM | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nevada | 2 | 1 | 128% | 2 | 0.42 | 0.07 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
New Mexico | NM | 10 | NM | NM | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Utah | 5 | 2 | 95% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wyoming | 10 | 10 | 2.1% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pacific Contiguous | 10 | 17 | -42% | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 | NM | 2 | NM | NM |
California | 7 | 14 | -52% | 6 | 6 | 0.47 | 5 | NM | 2 | NM | NM |
Oregon | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
Washington | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.00 | NM | NM |
Pacific Noncontiguous | 1,071 | 1,019 | 5.1% | 932 | 847 | 119 | 153 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 18 |
Alaska | 171 | 160 | 6.8% | 164 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 6 | 7 |
Hawaii | 900 | 859 | 4.8% | 768 | 694 | 119 | 153 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 |
U.S. Total | 1,616 | 1,509 | 7.1% | 1,315 | 1,197 | 254 | 258 | 10 | 18 | 38 | 37 |
Notes: See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |