Crude Mix Changed with Little Yield Impact
3.8
3.3
Residual Fuel Oil
80.9
80.5
Light Products
50.2
49.8
Gasoline
2004 Jan-Nov
2003 Jan-Nov
Yields
Product Yields for 9 Gulf Coast Refiners Using Mixed Crude Oils
Source: Form EIA-810
SWith all the shifts that occurred, light product yields rose very slightly, and residual fuel yields only increased 0.5 percent.

SPart of  this was due to the ability of these refiners to increase their use of conversion capacity slightly during the shoulder months.  In addition, as just described, refiners’ use of crude oils is not simple, and complex refiners, such as those we have in the U.S., do have a fair degree of flexibility that they exercise by being able to use a wide range of crude oil feeds.

SWe also looked at 8 sweet crude oil refineries (on both the Gulf Coast, Midwest, and East Coast), representing almost 2 million barrels per day of refinery inputs.  In this case, we saw some increase in the use of heavy and intermediate sweet crude oils in place of the light sweet crude oils.  But again, we saw only a slight decline in gasoline yield, which may have been due to increased MTBE bans this year as well as the crude oil quality shift.  Residual yield stayed at about the same level.

SThe U.S. examples tell us that a) complex refineries have more flexibility to use heavy sour crude oils than the simple conversion capacity limitation theory would imply and b) U.S. complex refineries had enough flexibility to both use more heavy sour as the economics improved, but also to do so without much residual yield penalty.

SThese examples have been for the U.S., where we have detailed data.  But the U.S. has the most complex refinery system in the world.  What about the rest of the world?