![]() |
This Week In Petroleum EIA Home > Petroleum > This Week In Petroleum |
|
Released on June 18, 2003 Revisions (or Take 2) In considering this question, it is important to understand how much data were available to the IEA for its preliminary end-March estimates, released in their May report. In early May, when the IEA was finalizing their data for the May OMR, they had weekly data for the United States for end-March inventory levels available as well as monthly government estimates from Japan, South Korea and Mexico. The IEA also used industry estimates for some European countries, and made their own estimates for the rest of the countries in the OECD. For the United States, where EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report data is available, the IEA, in accordance with its standard statistical methodology, took the change from end-February to end-March inventory levels as shown in EIA’s weekly data, and applied it to the end-February data point as reported on EIA’s monthly survey. As explained below, the IEA methodology may have produced biased estimates. If the end-February data point from the monthly survey (as published in EIA’s Petroleum Supply Monthly) is close to the end-February data point using the weekly data, then one might expect there to be little difference between the IEA’s initial estimate of end-March U.S. inventory levels and the level shown in EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report. However, there was a significant gap for end-February inventories between EIA’s Petroleum Supply Monthly) and its Weekly Petroleum Status Report because of estimates of “other oils” stock levels in the Weekly Petroleum Status Report. EIA does not actually survey stock levels for “other oils” weekly, relying instead on a model to estimate these levels, based on historical seasonal trends and the latest monthly data available. However, when circumstances exist that might alter normal seasonal patterns (e.g., high natural gas prices and much colder weather than normal), EIA’s model estimates of “other oils” stock levels can deviate significantly from the final inventory data reported in the Petroleum Supply Monthly). (The Petroleum Supply Monthly) surveys individual inventory levels for all the products that make up the “other oils” category.) Thus, in this case, EIA reported a 14.6 million barrel downward revision for end-March U.S. commercial petroleum inventories (the estimate from the weekly data was 888.0 million barrels while the estimate from the monthly data was 873.4 million barrels). The IEA, however, using its methodology to estimate end-March U.S. inventories, derived a lower estimate originally, which was revised upward by nearly 20 million barrels when monthly data for March became available. At least for the United States, since EIA’s weekly and monthly data come from different surveys, history suggests that revisions for one month do not carry over into subsequent months, making it dangerous to assume that current inventory levels are off by a similar amount. What is lost in all this confusion is that both the IEA and EIA are using an estimate of 873.4 million barrels for end-March U.S. commercial petroleum inventories as of the IEA’s June OMR. Both organizations agree that this is a very low level, both compared to year-ago levels and to seasonal norms for this time of year. The IEA states in its June report that, “Aggregate OECD crude stocks remain low while North America crude stocks, basically unaffected by the revisions, are trending below their 5-year average.” And in the United States, crude oil inventories are even further below their 5-year average than for North America as a whole. Clearly inventories remain low and more oil will be needed over the next several months to rebuild depleted inventories, no matter what preliminary estimates were made in the past. The present indicates that inventories in the OECD, and in particular the United States, are low, even after the 5.9-million-barrel build in U.S. commercial petroleum inventories last week, and EIA’s forecast of the near future (published in the Short-Term Energy Outlook) does not indicate a return to normal inventory levels for some months to come. So, while revisions to data can make for an exciting story, it’s important to concentrate on the latest “real” data available, which by all indications show that inventories remain low. U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices Rise by Almost 3 Cents Retail diesel fuel prices increased for the first time in fourteen weeks, rising 1.0 cent per gallon as of June 16 to a national average of 143.2 cents per gallon, which is still 15.7 cents per gallon higher than a year ago. While retail diesel prices were mixed throughout the nation last week, they were up considerably on the West Coast, where prices rose on average by 9.7 cents to average 157.0 cents per gallon. More specifically, the most dramatic increases were in California, where refinery problems also limited diesel supplies. As a result, retail diesel prices in California increased by 13.4 cents per gallon last week to reach an average of 165.1 cents per gallon. The region with the lowest price is the Lower Atlantic, where prices for diesel averaged 137.7 cents per gallon. Strong Imports Continue to Lift Propane Inventories
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|