xxxxx Welcome to EIA's Natural Gas Weekly Update. If you need assistance viewing this page, please call (202) 586-8800.
Home  >  Natural Gas  >  Natural Gas Weekly Update

Printer-Friendly Version 

Weekly Natural Gas Storage
U.S. Natural Gas Imports and Exports: 2004
Residential Natural Gas Prices: What Consumers Should Know
An Assessment of Prices of Natural Gas Futures Contracts As A Predictor of Realized Spot Prices at the Henry Hub
Overview of U.S. Legislation and Regulations Affecting Offshore Natural Gas and Oil Activity
Changes in U.S. Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure in 2004
Major Legislative and Regulatory Actions (1935 - 2004)
U.S. LNG Markets and Uses: June 2004
Natural Gas Restructuring
Previous Issues of Natural Gas Weekly Update
Natural Gas Homepage
EIA’s Natural Gas Division Survey Form Comments

Overview:  Thursday, August 3 (next release 2:00 p.m. on August 10, 2006)

Natural gas spot prices increased sharply this week (Wednesday-Wednesday, July 26 – August 2), as demand for power generation remained high in order to meet air-conditioning load and crude oil continued to trade near record-high prices. For the week, the price at the Henry Hub increased $1.94 per MMBtu, or about 29 percent, to $8.65. At the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the August contract expired last Thursday, July 27, at $7.042 per MMBtu, about $1.16 more than the previous month’s settlement. The price of the futures contract for September delivery at the Henry Hub moved about 83 cents per MMBtu higher on the week to settle yesterday (Wednesday, August 2) at $7.799. Natural gas in storage was 2,775 Bcf as of Friday, July 28, which is 19.2 percent higher than the 5-year average. The spot price for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil increased $2.34 per barrel or about 3 percent, since last Wednesday (July 26) to trade yesterday at $76.16 per barrel or $13.13 per MMBtu.

 

 

Prices:

Natural gas prices increased this week as continued scorching heat blanketed most of the Lower 48 States. The Henry Hub price rose in all but one trading session this week, including an increase of 80 cents per MMBtu on Monday, July 31. The Henry Hub price on Tuesday gained an additional 62 cents to average $8.67, which was the highest price for next day delivery at the Henry Hub since February 1, 2006. Other trading locations in producing areas along the Gulf Coast and in West Texas registered significant increases ranging from $0.73 to $3.09 per MMBtu. The extreme heat across the country has lifted demand for natural gas from power generators in order to meet cooling demand. According to data from the Edison Electric Institute, electric energy output has exceeded last year’s levels for the past 2 weeks by 0.7 percent. As electric generation surges, the power-grid operators tend to call on the region’s gas-fueled peaking facilities. Natural gas spot price increases on the week were widespread, with prices at most reporting market locations increasing by more than $1.00 per MMBtu. In the Northeast, temperatures reached over 100 degrees in many consuming areas. The result was this week’s highest price increases in the country at an average of $2.37 per MMBtu. The price for gas off Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line into New York City increased $2.60 per MMBtu, or nearly 34 percent, to $10.33, which is close to a $1.70-premium to the Henry Hub price. Prices increased significantly in the Rockies and the West Coast as well, albeit slightly less so than in the East. The price at the Southern California border increased $0.60 per MMBtu, or 9 percent, to $7.39. Trading locations in the Rockies registered an average increase of $0.55 per MMBtu to trade at an average of $6.76.  

 

 

At the NYMEX, the futures contract for August delivery expired last Thursday, July 27, at a closing price of $7.042 per MMBtu. During its tenure as the near-month contract, the August contract gained nearly $0.91 per MMBtu, or 15 percent, in value. The net gain on the month marks only the second time since October 2005 (when the November 2005 contract expired) that a contract’s price has increased while trading as the near-month contract. The price of the NYMEX futures contract for September delivery gained close to $0.83 per MMBtu on the week to settle at $7.799 yesterday (August 2). Prices of futures contracts moved up this week in response to the current high temperatures, speculation over the path of Tropical Storm Chris, and  higher prices for crude oil and petroleum products that compete with natural gas. Tropical Storm Chris now appears to be weakening as it moves closer to the Florida Keys, however there has been considerable uncertainty about the possibility of Chris gaining strength as it enters the Gulf of Mexico. The price of the September contract has increased in five of the past six trading sessions. The price increases resulted in the highest price for a near-month contract ($8.211 per MMBtu on Monday, July 31) since February 3, 2006. However, the September contract itself has traded at over $9 per MMBtu as recently as late April. Contracts for the next heating season (November 2006 through March 2007) increased an average of nearly 75 cents per MMBtu to settle at an average of $10.952, which held a premium of about $2.30 per MMBtu over yesterday’s Henry Hub cash price. The 12-month strip, which is an average of futures prices for the coming year, increased 56 cents per MMBtu to $9.556 since last Wednesday (July 26).

 

Recent Natural Gas Market Data

 

Estimated Average Wellhead Prices

 

Feb-06

Mar-06

Apr-06

May-06

June-06

July-06

Price ($ per Mcf)

7.28

6.52

6.59

6.19

5.80

5.82

Price ($ per MMBtu)

7.09

6.35

6.42

6.03

5.65

5.67

Note: Prices were converted from $ per Mcf to $ per MMBtu using an average heat content of 1,027 Btu per cubic foot as published in Table A4 of the Annual Energy Review 2002.

Source:  Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas.

 

Storage:

Working gas in storage as of July 28 was 2,775 Bcf, which is 19.2 percent above the 5-year average inventory level for the reporting week, according to EIA’s Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (See Storage Figure). The implied net injection of 19 Bcf for the report week was less than one-third the 5-year average net injection of 62 Bcf and about 49 percent lower than the last year’s net injection of 37 Bcf. As a result, the difference between this year’s stocks and the 5-year average has decreased to 447 Bcf, and the difference between this year’s stock level and last year declined to 360 Bcf.  With the exception of the net withdrawal reported by EIA for the week ending July 21, this report week’s net injection of 19 Bcf is the lowest for the Lower 48 States since the first week of the injection season in April. Cooling demand in key market locations once again contributed to reduced net injections, as warmer-than-normal temperatures were extensive (See Temperature Maps). Temperatures across the Lower 48 States were about 21 percent warmer than normal for the week ending July 28, according to the number of cooling degree days as measured by the National Weather Service. Most notably, cooling degree days in the Pacific Census division were more than double the normal level for week. The Pacific division includes California, a State with a considerable number of power plants that are fueled by natural gas.

 

Other Market Trends:

DOE Releases Final Report on the Impact of the 2005 Hurricanes on the Natural Gas Industry: On July 31, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released a report titled Impact of the 2005 Hurricanes on the Natural Gas Industry in the Gulf of Mexico Region, which summarizes DOE’s findings based on its monitoring of the impact of hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the natural gas industry from late August 2005 through early March 2006. The 24-page final report details the extent of damage to the natural gas industry from the two storms, which together caused the biggest disruption in history to operations in the Gulf region. Hurricane Katrina and Rita, Category 5 and 4 storms, respectively, destroyed 113 platforms and damaged 52 others. The hurricanes also damaged at least 183 offshore pipelines, some of which were large-diameter pipelines. In comparison, only 7 platforms were destroyed when Hurricane Ivan, a Category 4 storm affected the Gulf in 2004, as Ivan’s path bypassed the major production infrastructure. As a consequence of both hurricanes, virtually all large natural gas processing plants in the area from Galveston Bay, Texas, through Mississippi were shut down temporarily. A total of 27 plants were affected, or nearly 75 percent of total processing capacity in the region, and operations were disrupted at several fractionators (natural gas liquids plants). In its final shut-in statistics report on June 21, 2006, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) estimated that about 936 million cubic feet (MMcf) of daily gas production in the offshore Federal Gulf of Mexico remained shut in, as of June 19, and estimated the cumulative shut-in production at 803.6 billion cubic feet (Bcf).  The Gulf of Mexico is a major source of U.S. natural gas. Prior to the hurricanes, the Federal offshore in the Gulf of Mexico provided about 10 Bcf of gas per day or 20 percent of all the natural gas produced domestically.

 

National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency:  The U.S. Department of Energy in a joint effort with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency (NAPEE), which was released on July 31, 2006. The NAPEE provides energy consumers and providers the necessary information concerning policies and techniques that are expected to save money and protect the environment. The action plan was developed by a leadership group of more than 50 organizations, which included 23 electric and natural gas utilities and 16 State agencies. The NAPEE provides five recommendations for helping States and utility companies overcome policy, regulatory, and other barriers that limit investment in energy efficiency. The recommendations include:

  • Recognize energy efficiency as a high-priority energy resource
  • Make a strong as well as long-term commitment to implement cost-effective energy efficiency as a resource
  • Broadly communicate the benefits of opportunities for energy efficiency
  • Promote sufficient, timely, as well as stable program funding that would advance energy efficiency where cost-effective. 
  • Modify policies to align utility incentives with the delivery of cost-effective energy efficiency and modify ratemaking practices to promote energy efficiency investments. 

More than 80 energy, environmental, and other organizations have declared their support for the new plan. During the winter of 2006–2007, the leadership group plans to report on its progress and identify next steps for the action plan.

 

EIA Evaluation of Annual Energy Outlook Projections:  The Energy Information Administration (EIA) released on Thursday, July 27, an evaluation of the projections published in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO).  This annual publication compares the projections included in each edition of the AEO since 1982 with realized energy outcomes.  Each year, the comparison adds the most recent AEO projections and updates the historical data to the most recently available.  In order to summarize the relationship between projected and actual outcomes, EIA uses the average absolute percent difference for several of the major variables from the AEO82 through AEO2005.  According to the evaluation, the projections of energy consumption, energy production, and carbon dioxide emissions have been relatively close to realized outcomes (between 2 percent and 7 percent different on average), the projections of net energy imports have been moderately close to realized outcomes (between 6 percent and 8 percent different on average), and the projections of energy prices have been the furthest from realized outcomes (between 18 and 83 percent different on average).  Natural gas, in general, is the fuel with the largest differences between projected and actual prices.  The average absolute percent difference for natural gas wellhead prices over all projections is 65.1 percent.  In previous evaluations, this percentage has been as high as 82.6 percent.  EIA explains that regulatory reforms in the mid-1980s, which increased the role of competitive natural gas markets, made natural gas prices particularly difficult to predict.  Other factors leading to the large differential are EIA’s conservative expectation of technology improvements in early editions of the AEO, and natural gas resource estimates that steadily rose.  EIA also notes that external factors such as severe weather, economic cycles, and supply disruptions have an impact on energy markets that cannot be anticipated in the long-run and therefore cannot be captured in the AEO model and underlying assumptions. 

 

Natural Gas Transportation Update:

  • Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL) began maintenance Tuesday, August 1, that may cut Chicago-area deliveries by 25 percent.  NGPL estimates that the maintenance may keep 400,000 Dekatherms per day out of the market for about a week.
  • With a daily restriction on interruptible storage injections, ANR Pipeline Company reported that all of their customers have met the requirement to reduce their storage account balances to less than 35 percent of their June 14 allocated balances.  Customers are required to stay below this 35 percent level until further notice.   
  • Four pipeline companies have imposed restrictions on their systems owing to limited operational flexibility and extreme temperatures this week.  Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company issued a Critical Day Operational Flow Orders (OFO) on Wednesday, August 3, which led to a separate balancing alert by East Tennessee Natural Gas Pipeline Company on Thursday.  Both companies require certain shippers to maintain a daily flow rate within a tolerance of 2 percent from scheduled quantities or 1,000 Dekatherms per day, whichever is greater.  During the OFO, which will be in effect until further notice, Tennessee cannot accept unscheduled imbalances.  Florida Gas Transmission Company extended an Overage Alert Day for the third day on Wednesday and decreased the tolerance from 25 percent to 20 percent.  The restraint means that shippers mush stay within the set percentage of daily scheduled volumes.  Lastly, Transcontinental Pipeline Company (Transco) took several precautions on Wednesday in response to the hot weather.  First, Transco set the balancing tolerance to 1 percent for shippers.  The company also announced that it will not allow any excess storage withdrawals and will not allow incremental loans or returns of parked gas. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Short-Term Energy Outlook

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/ngw/ngupdate.asp
Need Help?
phone: 202-586-8800
email: infoctr@eia.doe.gov
Specialized Services from NEIC
For Technical Problems
phone: 202-586-8959

email:
wmaster@eia.doe.gov
Energy Information Administration, EI 30
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
.
Home | Petroleum | Gasoline | Diesel | Propane | Natural Gas | Electricity | Coal | Nuclear
Renewables | Alternative Fuels | Prices | States | International | Country Analysis Briefs
Environment | Analyses | Forecasts | Processes | Sectors