for week ending July 6, 2006 | Release date: July 7, 2006 | Previous weeks
Overview: Friday,
July 7 (next release 2:00 p.m. on July 13, 2006)
Natural gas spot prices decreased
sharply this week (Wednesday - Thursday, June 28 - July 6), although crude oil prices
continued to trade at near record high levels. For the week, the price at the
Henry Hub decreased $0.76 per MMBtu, or about 13 percent, to $5.28. At the New
York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the price of the futures contract for August
delivery at the Henry Hub moved about 50 cents per MMBtu lower to settle
yesterday (Thursday, July 6) at $5.664. Natural
gas in storage was 2,615 Bcf as of Friday, June 30, which is 29.2 percent
higher than the 5-year average. Crude
oil continued to trade at near record-high prices. The spot price for West
Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil increased $2.85 per barrel or about 3 percent
since last Wednesday (June 28) to trade yesterday at $75.00 per barrel or
$12.93 per MMBtu.
Spot
prices decreased last week as cooler-than-normal temperatures in many areas of
the country limited demand for natural gas as a fuel for power generation to meet
air-conditioning load. The lack of industrial demand during the holiday week,
as well as generally ample supplies already in storage this summer, contributed
to the widespread price declines. The absence of any significant tropical storm
activity in the Gulf of Mexico also appeared to be a factor in weakening
prices. The price decline has occurred despite a significant increase in oil
prices.(For a discussion of natural gas
and residual fuel oil prices, see Other Market Trends, below.) Prices at all reporting
market locations decreased by $0.33 per MMBtu or more. The Henry Hub price has
fallen in three consecutive trading sessions, including a decrease of 43 cents
per MMBtu yesterday (July 6). The Henry Hub price ended the week at $5.28 per
MMBtu, which is the lowest price for next day delivery at the Henry Hub since
November 2004. Other trading locations in producing areas along the Gulf Coast registered
decreases similar to the $0.76 per MMBtu decline at the Henry Hub, with most
points falling between $0.65 and $0.92 per MMBtu. This week's largest price decreases
occurred at market locations in the Northeast, where prices declined an average
of $0.97 per MMBtu. The price for gas off Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line into
New York City decreased $1.05 per MMBtu to $5.70. Prices decreased
significantly at trading locations in the Rockies and the West Coast as well,
albeit slightly less so than in the East. The price at the Southern California
border decreased $0.52 per MMBtu, or 9 percent, to $5.25. Trading locations in
the Rockies registered an average decline of $0.38 per MMBtu to trade at an
average of $4.78.
The price of the NYMEX
futures contract for August delivery declined $0.496 per MMBtu on the week to
end trading yesterday (July 6) at $5.664. Similar to price activity in the spot
markets, the prices of futures contracts moved lower this week in response to
the moderate seasonal weather experienced throughout much of the Lower 48
States, including the lack of tropical storm activity that could disrupt
supplies from the Gulf of Mexico producing region. The price of the near-month
contract has decreased in five consecutive trading sessions. The price
decreases resulted in the lowest price for a near-month contract since
September 27, 2004. The 12-month strip, which is an average of futures prices
for the coming year, decreased 34 cents per MMBtu to $8.145 since last Wednesday
(June 28). Currently, the NYMEX contract for February 2007 is the highest priced
contract over the next 12 months. The February 2007 contract closed yesterday
at $10.132 per MMBtu, down about 32 cents on the week. Nonetheless, the
February 2007 contract as of the end of trading yesterday carried a premium of $4.85
per MMBtu to the spot Henry Hub price. This premium is considerably more than
the historical norm, and at a minimum provides a strong economic incentive to
inject gas into storage.
Recent Natural Gas Market Data
Estimated Average Wellhead Prices |
||||||
|
Dec-05 |
Jan-06 |
Feb-06 |
Mar-06 |
Apr-06 |
May-06 |
10.02 |
8.66 |
7.28 |
6.52 |
6.59 |
6.19 |
|
Price
($ per MMBtu) |
9.76 |
8.43 |
7.09 |
6.35 |
6.42 |
6.02 |
Note:
Prices were converted from $ per Mcf to $ per MMBtu using an average heat
content of 1,027 Btu per cubic foot as published in Table A4 of the Annual
Energy Review 2002. |
||||||
Source:Energy Information Administration, Office
of Oil and Gas. |
Working gas in storage as of June 30 totaled 2,615
Bcf, which is 29.2 percent above the 5-year average inventory level for the
reporting week, according to EIA's Weekly
Natural Gas Storage Report. (See
Storage Figure) The implied net injection of 73 Bcf is 21
percent less than the 5-year average net injection of 92 Bcf, yet about 4
percent higher than last year's net injection of 70 Bcf. As a result, the
difference between this year's stocks and the 5-year average declined to 591
Bcf, and the difference between current stocks and storage levels at this time
last year grew to 425 Bcf. This week's report marks the seventh
consecutive report in which the net injection fell short of the 5-year average
net injection and the eighth report in the past 13 weeks (since the beginning
of the injection season) in which the net injection was below average. Despite
the lower-than-average injections, however, working gas inventories remain
considerably higher than normal. Even if net injections only reach the lowest
monthly totals of any year in the past 5 years for the remainder of the
injection season (through October), storage levels would reach almost 3,400 Bcf
by the beginning of the heating season. Temperatures during the report week
were warmer than normal for the country as a whole, likely resulting in cooling
demand, and leading to the below average injection during the week. (See Temperature Maps) Overall, cooling degree days (CDDs),
as measured by the National Weather Service, were about 7 percent above normal.
Other Market Trends:
Recent Trends in Natural Gas and Residual Fuel Oil
Prices: Changing market conditions in the United
States over the past 7 months have led to dramatic decreases in natural gas
prices from the historically high levels prevailing at the beginning of the year. This has resulted in a shift from the typical
price pattern in which natural gas prices exceed that of residual fuel oil. For
example, from November 2002 through January 2006, the price of natural gas to
electric utilities exceeded that of residual fuel oil. In the subsequent 5 months, natural gas
prices have been below residual oil prices.As competing fuels in certain markets, the price of residual fuel oil
often serves as a floor for natural gas prices. However, the recent change in the relative price pattern for these two
fuels occurred as global conditions led to rising crude oil and petroleum
products prices while conditions in the North American gas market resulted in
declining natural gas prices.
The decline in natural gas
prices reflects the easing of market tightness since the beginning of the
year. Supplies have increased as
domestic production and imports have expanded. The recovery of the oil and gas industry in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM)
region continues, and reported natural gas production shut-ins in the Federal
offshore GOM have declined from roughly 2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) at
the beginning of the year to about 0.94 Bcf/d as of June 19. Increased
liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports likely also contributed to the decrease in
price. Although LNG imports were
relatively low early in the year, LNG imports in April increased by 58 percent
compared with the average volumes imported between January and March 2006. In
addition, end-use consumption during January-April 2006 was 8 percent less than
year-ago levels. The improved supply
picture and reduced demand have put downward pressure on natural gas prices.
The cost of residual fuel oil
has been below natural gas prices with few exceptions since the 1990s. A
comparison of the costs of residual fuel and natural gas to electric utilities
provides an illustrative example. Between June 2000 and February 2006, the
average monthly cost of natural gas to electric utilities exceeded the cost of
residual fuel oil 88 percent of the time—in 60 months out of the 68-month
period. However, since February 2006, the price of natural gas to electric
power utilities has dropped, and by June 2006 it was estimated to be almost $2
per MMBtu, or 23 percent, lower than the price of residual fuel oil.
In the near-term, natural gas
prices are expected to not be constrained unduly by residual fuel oil
prices.Although natural gas prices are
projected again to exceed residual fuel oil prices by the 2006-2007 winter,
this historical pattern is expected to be reversed by April 2007.However, while the current trend continues,
natural gas will be an economically attractive choice for electric utilities,
as well as other energy customers.
New Study on Capacity Constraints on Canadian Natural
Gas Pipelines: Canada's independent Federal agency for the
energy industry, the National Energy Board (NEB), released a report on Friday,
June 30, titled An Assessment of the
Canadian Hydrocarbon Transportation System. The report examined the adequacy and economic efficiency of the oil,
gas, and petroleum product pipelines regulated by the NEB, including capacity
constraints, prices of services, and the ability to meet the demands of the
market. According to the NEB, there is sufficient or excess capacity in place on
existing natural gas pipelines even during the peak winter season. However, there are
constraints at the market end of some pipelines as indicated by expansions
currently underway, and growth in demand for natural gas in North
America, especially for oil sands production, is expected to present new
challenges in the near future. Growing
supplies from liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports are expected to help meet the
increase in demand but will also impact natural gas flow patterns and create
the need for new pipelines to feed LNG from receiving terminals into the
pipeline system. In addition to the
capacity conclusions, the NEB found that oil and natural gas shippers are
reasonably satisfied with the services they receive from pipeline companies in
Canada, and that NEB-regulated pipeline companies are financially sound.
Natural Gas Transportation Update: