Electric Power Monthly
Data for June 2025
Release Date:
August 26, 2025
Next Release Date:
September 24, 2025
Full report PDF
| Table 1.5.A. Utility Scale Facility Net Generation from Petroleum Liquids |
| by State, by Sector, June 2025 and 2024 (Thousand Megawatthours) |
| All Sectors | Electric Power Sector | Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers |
||||||||||
| Generation at Utility Scale Facilities | Generation at Utility Scale Facilities | Generation at Utility Scale Facilities | Generation at Utility Scale Facilities | Generation at Utility Scale Facilities | |||||||
| Census Division and State |
June 2025 | June 2024 | Percentage Change |
June 2025 | June 2024 | June 2025 | June 2024 | June 2025 | June 2024 | June 2025 | June 2024 |
| New England | 76 | 39 | 97.4% | 6 | 6 | 67 | 30 | NM | NM | 2 | 1 |
| Connecticut | NM | 11 | NM | NM | 0.32 | NM | 11 | NM | NM | 0.02 | 0 |
| Maine | 20 | 9 | 129.6% | 0 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 26 | 15 | 76.7% | 5 | 5 | 20 | 8 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| New Hampshire | NM | 4 | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | 3 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 |
| Rhode Island | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Vermont | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Middle Atlantic | 96 | 41 | 133.7% | 23 | 7 | 70 | 31 | NM | NM | NM | 1 |
| New Jersey | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| New York | 81 | 33 | 146.9% | 22 | 7 | 57 | 25 | NM | NM | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| Pennsylvania | NM | 8 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 6 | 0.32 | 0.18 | NM | 1 |
| East North Central | 43 | 35 | 24.7% | 27 | NM | 15 | 10 | 0.46 | 0.11 | 1 | 1 |
| Illinois | 6 | 1 | 325.9% | NM | 1 | 5 | 1 | NM | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
| Indiana | 12 | 11 | 6.2% | 12 | 11 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.09 | 0.01 | NM | 0.04 |
| Michigan | 10 | 6 | 67.9% | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0.31 | 0.37 |
| Ohio | 13 | 11 | 14.2% | NM | 1 | 11 | 10 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| Wisconsin | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -0.01 | -0.01 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| West North Central | 62 | NM | NM | 61 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
| Iowa | 16 | NM | NM | 16 | NM | NM | NM | 0.03 | 0.00 | NM | NM |
| Kansas | 7 | 7 | 7.8% | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| Missouri | 29 | 15 | 92.4% | 29 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Nebraska | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Dakota | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| South Dakota | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0.00 | 0.00 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| South Atlantic | 146 | 72 | 102.8% | 71 | 39 | 60 | 14 | NM | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| Delaware | NM | 2 | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Florida | 16 | 9 | 71.8% | 15 | 8 | NM | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0.37 |
| Georgia | 17 | 17 | 3.5% | 3 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | 0.09 | 13 | 14 |
| Maryland | 49 | 8 | 487.0% | 1 | 0.02 | 48 | 8 | 0.01 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 10 | 6 | 56.6% | 9 | 6 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| South Carolina | 12 | 8 | 57.2% | 12 | 7 | NM | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.13 |
| Virginia | 25 | 13 | 90.0% | 17 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 0.06 | 3 | NM | NM |
| West Virginia | 14 | 9 | 61.8% | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East South Central | 24 | 11 | 126.7% | 23 | 10 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 1 | NM |
| Alabama | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Kentucky | 8 | 6 | 38.8% | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 1 | 1 | -37.4% | NM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.46 | 0.04 |
| Tennessee | 15 | 3 | 358.2% | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| West South Central | 28 | 20 | 38.3% | 11 | 9 | 16 | 11 | NM | NM | 1 | 0.47 |
| Arkansas | 3 | NM | NM | 3 | NM | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Louisiana | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oklahoma | 3 | 2 | 50.9% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0.10 |
| Texas | 20 | 17 | 22.9% | 4 | 5 | 16 | 11 | NM | NM | 0.46 | 0.35 |
| Mountain | 23 | NM | NM | 20 | NM | 3 | 2 | NM | NM | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Arizona | 6 | NM | NM | 6 | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Colorado | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Idaho | 0.01 | 0 | -- | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Montana | 2 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 1 | 1 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Utah | 5 | 5 | 2.9% | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 7 | 5 | 47.8% | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pacific Contiguous | 15 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 1 | NM | 1 | 10 | NM |
| California | 13 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 1 | 10 | 0.11 |
| Oregon | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Washington | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | NM | NM |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | 640 | 631 | 1.5% | 496 | 491 | 127 | 122 | 1 | 0.26 | 16 | 18 |
| Alaska | 88 | 88 | -0.8% | 83 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | NM | 5 | 4 |
| Hawaii | 553 | 543 | 1.8% | 413 | 407 | 127 | 122 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 12 | 14 |
| U.S. Total | 1,153 | 909 | 26.9% | 740 | 641 | 360 | 222 | NM | 7 | 46 | 39 |
| NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. Notes: See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Negative generation denotes that electric power consumed for plant use exceeds gross generation. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |