Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Are Refinery Investments Responding to Market Changes?
  • Joanne Shore
  • John Hackworth
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration


  • March  2009 NPRA Annual Meeting
2
Overview
  • Long-Term Look at Market Drivers Impacting Investment Decisions


  • Atlantic Basin Investments
3
Long-Term Look at Market Drivers Impacting Investment Decisions
  • Demand: Growth and Mix Shift


  • Feedstocks: Incentives to use lower quality feedstocks (Light-heavy differentials)


  • Margins
4
Long-Term Demand Growth and Product Mix Shifts
  • Growth: Mainly outside the Atlantic Basin


  • Product Mix Shifts & Investment:
    • U.S. – Different future
    • Europe – Continued shift from gasoline to distillate
    • Asia – Less issue of shift than of growth
5
World Petroleum Consumption Growing: Largest Growth Outside U.S. & Europe
6
Europe Major Driver of World Consumption  Mix Shift Towards Distillates
7
Atlantic Basin Price Incentives Shifting Toward Distillates
8
Feedstocks: Investing to Take Advantage of Widening Light-Heavy Differentials

  • Light-heavy price difference – Incentive for investing in bottoms processing investments


  • Drivers behind the widening price difference


  • Future direction?
9
Light-Heavy Product Price Difference Increases with Crude Oil Price
10
Light-Heavy Price Differentials
Move Together
11
Higher Light-Heavy Price Differences Go with Higher Price Levels – But Much “Scatter”
12
Factors Impacting Light-Heavy Price Differentials
  • Crude oil price level – EIA forecasts indicate increasing crude prices with economic recovery
  • Available mix of light-heavy crude oil – Short-term variations, but mid-term mix not likely to change much
  • Market for residual fuel products – Low sulfur bunker fuel uncertainties
  • Changes in bottoms processing capacity – Not seeing planned increases having a large impact on differentials
13
Margins – Short Golden Age for Capacity Expansion Incentives

  • Margin Indicators


  • U.S. vs. Europe


14
Refining Output Variations Impact Profitability
15
U.S. Margin Indicator Usually Higher Due to No Residual Fuel and More Gasoline
16
Atlantic Basin Investments
  • United States


  • Europe
17
U.S.  Investment Environment
  • Before 2008
    • Forecasts called for increasing demand (gasoline and distillate) and need for capacity expansions
    • Slow shifts to distillate
    • Saw planned expansion with hydrocracking investments (Marathon Garyville, Motiva Port Arthur, Valero)


  • 2008
    • Surge in world distillate demand (mainly electricity needs) sent distillate prices up
    • U.S. refiners began shifting yields to distillate through operating changes alone
    • Recession reduced demand, some projects delayed
    • U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) reduced long-term need for petroleum-based gasoline
18
Long-Term U.S. Petroleum-Based* Gasoline and Distillate Fuel Needs Shift with EISA
19
In 2008, U.S. Shifts from Net Importer to Net Exporter of Distillate – Short or Long Term?
20
Distillate Yields Reflect Price Incentives
21
Operating Changes and Next Step Investments Before Hydrocracking
  • Cut-Point Shifts


  • Distillation Efficiency Improvements


  • Catalyst Changes


  • Hydrotreating expansion


22
U.S. Investment Uncertainties
  • Short-term signals
    • How long will the economic slump keep demand down?
    • How long will strong short-term distillate pull from other countries continue – Europe in particular
    • Lower utilization vs. closures

  • Long-term signals
    • Need for new capacity moved out in time. How far?
    • Still seeing need for shift to distillate from gasoline,  but will U.S. (and world) policies further change level and mix of petroleum product needs?
    • Clear “wait-and-see” time


23
European Investment Environment
  • Forecasts continue to show increasing need for distillate and declining need for gasoline


  • Margins under pressure in the short term.


  • U.S. market for European gasoline exports coming under pressure


  • Diesel import availability increasing
24
OECD Europe: Imbalance Between Refining and Demand Met with Imports/Exports
25
Increasing European Distillate Production
  • Refineries are already operating at maximum distillate potential (unlike the U.S.)


  • Historical investments resulted in making more distillate by destroying residual fuel rather than reducing gasoline production


  • Additional hydrocracking capacity is planned, but residual fuel destruction still a large factor
26
European Capacity Plans (2008-2013)
27
European Investment Uncertainties
  • Short-term Signals
    • Economic slump impacts on capital expenditures: go, cancel, delay?
    • Need for and sources of distillate imports – short- or long-term changes?
    • U.S. gasoline market changes
    • Lower utilization vs. closures

  • Long-term Signals
    • Product demand projections have decreased.  Will that impact expansions?
    • Still seeing need for shift to distillate from gasoline,  but the rate at which the distillate imbalance was increasing has diminished
    • So is there change in views of investment incentives?


28
Summary
  • Investment to produce more distillate
    • Distillate price premiums to gasoline becoming the norm
    • Distillate investments occurring in both U.S. and Europe
  • Investment to upgrade bottoms
    • High light-heavy differentials inspired rash of upgrading, but differentials fell back with crude price.  Differentials could well increase again with projected crude price increases.
    • Bottoms conversion investments occurring in U.S. to use Canadian tar sands and in Europe to produce more distillate
  • Investment to expand production
    • Margin incentive is weak, and long-term refinery demand projections are flat or declining for U.S. and Europe
    •  Apart from individual project economics that might show synergies with accompanying upgrade, hard to see need  for more capacity
29