|
1
|
- Joanne Shore
- John Hackworth
- U.S. Energy Information Administration
- March 2009 NPRA Annual Meeting
|
|
2
|
- Long-Term Look at Market Drivers Impacting Investment Decisions
- Atlantic Basin Investments
|
|
3
|
- Demand: Growth and Mix Shift
- Feedstocks: Incentives to use lower quality feedstocks (Light-heavy
differentials)
- Margins
|
|
4
|
- Growth: Mainly outside the Atlantic Basin
- Product Mix Shifts & Investment:
- U.S. Different future
- Europe Continued shift from gasoline to distillate
- Asia Less issue of shift than of growth
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Light-heavy price difference Incentive for investing in bottoms
processing investments
- Drivers behind the widening price difference
- Future direction?
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Crude oil price level EIA forecasts indicate increasing crude prices
with economic recovery
- Available mix of light-heavy crude oil Short-term variations, but
mid-term mix not likely to change much
- Market for residual fuel products Low sulfur bunker fuel uncertainties
- Changes in bottoms processing capacity Not seeing planned increases
having a large impact on differentials
|
|
13
|
- Margin Indicators
- U.S. vs. Europe
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Before 2008
- Forecasts called for increasing demand (gasoline and distillate) and
need for capacity expansions
- Slow shifts to distillate
- Saw planned expansion with hydrocracking investments (Marathon
Garyville, Motiva Port Arthur, Valero)
- 2008
- Surge in world distillate demand (mainly electricity needs) sent
distillate prices up
- U.S. refiners began shifting yields to distillate through operating
changes alone
- Recession reduced demand, some projects delayed
- U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) reduced long-term need
for petroleum-based gasoline
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Cut-Point Shifts
- Distillation Efficiency Improvements
- Catalyst Changes
- Hydrotreating expansion
|
|
22
|
- Short-term signals
- How long will the economic slump keep demand down?
- How long will strong short-term distillate pull from other countries
continue Europe in particular
- Lower utilization vs. closures
- Long-term signals
- Need for new capacity moved out in time. How far?
- Still seeing need for shift to distillate from gasoline, but will U.S. (and world) policies
further change level and mix of petroleum product needs?
- Clear wait-and-see time
|
|
23
|
- Forecasts continue to show increasing need for distillate and declining
need for gasoline
- Margins under pressure in the short term.
- U.S. market for European gasoline exports coming under pressure
- Diesel import availability increasing
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Refineries are already operating at maximum distillate potential (unlike
the U.S.)
- Historical investments resulted in making more distillate by destroying
residual fuel rather than reducing gasoline production
- Additional hydrocracking capacity is planned, but residual fuel
destruction still a large factor
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Short-term Signals
- Economic slump impacts on capital expenditures: go, cancel, delay?
- Need for and sources of distillate imports short- or long-term
changes?
- U.S. gasoline market changes
- Lower utilization vs. closures
- Long-term Signals
- Product demand projections have decreased. Will that impact expansions?
- Still seeing need for shift to distillate from gasoline, but the rate at which the distillate
imbalance was increasing has diminished
- So is there change in views of investment incentives?
|
|
28
|
- Investment to produce more distillate
- Distillate price premiums to gasoline becoming the norm
- Distillate investments occurring in both U.S. and Europe
- Investment to upgrade bottoms
- High light-heavy differentials inspired rash of upgrading, but
differentials fell back with crude price. Differentials could well increase
again with projected crude price increases.
- Bottoms conversion investments occurring in U.S. to use Canadian tar
sands and in Europe to produce more distillate
- Investment to expand production
- Margin incentive is weak, and long-term refinery demand projections are
flat or declining for U.S. and Europe
- Apart from individual project
economics that might show synergies with accompanying upgrade, hard to
see need for more capacity
|
|
29
|
|