| Status: All residential customers in the
State are allowed to choose natural gas suppliers. |
| Overview: Since January 1, 2000, all
residential gas customers of the four local distribution companies in New
Jersey (Elizabethtown Gas, New Jersey Natural Gas, Public Service Electric
and Gas, and South Jersey Gas) have been able to choose their own gas
suppliers. In 2004, about 5 percent of the State's residential
customers were buying gas from non-utility suppliers, nearly the same
percentage as in 2003. As of December 2008, however, only 56,494
residential customers, or slightly more than 2 percent of the State's residential gas
consumers, were buying natural gas from marketers compared with 133,226 in
November 2004. Nevertheless, participation has steadily increased since 2005, with residential enrollment totaling about 33,327 in 2005, 37,586 in 2006, and 46,748 in 2007. The sharp increase in natural gas prices during 2005 made
it difficult for marketers to honor their contracts with consumers, and
South Jersey Energy, an affiliate and major supplier in South
Jersey Gas Company's service area, returned its customers to regulated
utility sales service. According to State licensing requirements for
marketers, customers must receive written notice at least 30 days in
advance that a supplier intends to terminate service and be informed, as
part of the customer contract, of the circumstances under which service can
be terminated. South Jersey Energy began serving residential customers again in 2006 after initiating a price protection service that locked in prices through December 2007. The company instituted a similar plan in 2008 for existing residential customers and intends to expand the program to include new customers in 2009. Ten marketers are licensed to serve
residential customers in the State. Commercial and industrial customers in
New Jersey have had unbundled service since early 1995. |
| EIA State Data: In 2007, New Jersey had 2,609,788 residential and 230,855 commercial customers. They consumed approximately 228 and 169 billion cubic feet of natural gas, respectively. The average prices residential and commercial customers paid for natural gas from local distribution companies were $14.48 and $12.10 per thousand cubic feet, respectively. Natural gas sales by marketers are included in the average price paid by residential customers. |
Eligibility and Participation in Retail Choice
Programs:
All residential gas customers may choose their own gas
supplier. Three of the four LDCs serving New Jersey previously offered
pilot programs for retail unbundling, beginning in 1997. New Jersey
Natural Gas offered a pilot program to 5,000 customers and South Jersey
Gas to up to 10,000 customers, while Public Service Electric and Gas
(PSE&G) offered its pilot program in only a small portion of its
service area. PSE&G ultimately terminated its pilot because of the
small amount of customer participation (fewer than 1,000 customers).
However, both the New Jersey Natural and South Jersey pilot programs were
oversubscribed and enlarged. |
Eligibility and Participation by Customer Class, December 2008
|
Customer Type |
2007 Customer Total |
Eligible December 2008 |
Participating December 2008 |
|
Total |
Percent
of Customers |
Total |
Percent
of Eligible
|
Percent
of 2007 Customer Total |
|
Residential |
2,609,788 |
2,616,836 |
100 |
56,494 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
|
Commercial/
Industrial* |
238,891 |
236,420 |
100 |
27,877 |
12.0 |
11.7 |
|
Total |
2,848,679 |
2,853,256 |
100 |
84,371 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
|
*New Jersey had 230,855 commercial and 8,036 industrial customers in 2007.
Source: 2007 Customer Total: Energy Information Administration, Natural Gas Annual 2007 (January 2009). Eligibility and Participation: New Jersey
Board of Public
Utilities (March 2009). | |
| |
Eligibility and Participation by Local Distribution Company, December 2008
|
Local Distribution
Company |
Number of Customers |
Residential |
Non-Residential |
Eligible |
Participating |
Eligible |
Participating |
|
Elizabethtown Gas |
252,396 |
734 |
18,961 |
2,739 |
|
NJ Natural Gas |
451,828 |
12,161 |
34,868 |
5,382 |
|
Public Service Electric and Gas |
1,594,656 |
18,766 |
159,341 |
16,544 |
|
South Jersey Gas |
317,956 |
24,833 |
23,250 |
3,212 |
|
Total |
2,616,836 |
56,494 |
236,420 |
27,877 |
|
Source: New Jersey Board of Public
Utilities (March 2009). | |
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
on Retail Unbundling
Summary: The strong customer
response to some of the pilot programs that were initiated in 1997 led the
State legislature to enact the "Electric Discount and Energy Competition
Act" on February 9, 1999, which called for statewide unbundling of the
natural gas industry by December 31, 1999. In January 2000, the Board of
Public Utilities approved rate unbundling filings for all four of the
State's LDCs, which included incentives for residential customers to
switch to third-party suppliers. The billing structure (including who will
prepare and send bills) for natural gas customers follows the electricity
sales billing model. In September 2000, the Board approved measures that
allow enrollment in customer choice programs through the Internet.
Previously, a customer's written signature was required before any change
could be made and Internet enrollments were limited to 10 percent. The
Board's action is in keeping with the Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act (effective October 2000), which puts Internet
transactions on a par with paper transactions
The 1999 legislation
also required the Board to determine by January 2002 whether to make
competitive basic gas supply service (BGSS) available to any gas supplier
or gas utility. On January 17, 2002, the Board ruled that the market was
not yet ready for a competitive BGSS structure but encouraged the
formation of utility-specific pilot programs subject to certain
guidelines. These guidelines include use of a 2-year minimum term,
inclusion of at least 25 percent of residential and small commercial
customers in the pilot, supplier access to interstate capacity and
storage, and uniform pricing for all customers within the same rate class
categories and no subsidization. |
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
|
Legislation |
02/03 |
Government Energy
Aggregation, A-2165, P.L. 2003. Revises the process for
governmental energy aggregation by allowing “all-in/opt out” tool, with the intent of making it easier to negotiate lower energy
rates. If a municipality forms an energy pool, it allows all residential
customers to be included unless they choose to opt out of the
program. Suppliers would have better knowledge of the size of the
energy pool, which will simplify rate negotiations. Municipalities
will be able to obtain load profile and other customer information
in electronic format. |
|
|
02/99 |
The Electric Discount and Energy
Competition Act, P.L. 1999.
Opens up the State energy industry to competition, mandating
restructuring of electric utilities by August 1999 and gas utilities
by December 31, 1999. Utilities are to be given the opportunity to
recover prudently incurred stranded costs. The Board of Public
Utilities is to oversee the restructuring process and to define
standards for fair competition, gas affiliate relations, accounting
and reporting, and third-party supplier licensing, safety, and
service quality. Gas and electric power suppliers must be licensed
before they can offer retail services. The act authorizes energy
aggregation by private and government
entities. |
Regulatory
Actions |
05/08 |
Board Adopted New Energy Competition Rules. The Board adopted new rules to replace portions of previous energy competition standards. The standards define options for community aggregation programs, require the separation of LDCs and affiliates, and include consumer protection provisions regarding "anti-slamming" for accounts signed up electronically via the Internet. The rules became effective on May 19, 2008, and will expire on April 18, 2011. |
|
11/07 |
Proposal to Allow Marketer Access to LDC Customer Information. The Board issued a request for comments to all interested parties concerning a procedure to allow local distribution companies (natural gas and electric) to release customer account information to third-party energy suppliers or clean power marketers. |
|
07/06 |
Comments Requested on Marketer Price-Reporting Requirements. The Board seeks comments on price-to-compare procedures that would allow customers to compare marketer and utility price offerings. |
|
|
11/04 |
Ownership Transfer Approved for
Elizabethtown Gas. The Board approved
the request for AGL Resources to acquire NUI Utilities Inc., doing
business as Elizabethtown Gas Company. |
|
|
06/03 |
New Rules Adopted for Government Energy
Aggregation Programs. Rules include
new procedures and options directed at increasing participation in
aggregation programs. Local governments can include all local
residential customers unless the individual chooses to “all-in/opt out” of the program. Nonresidential customers would be required to
opt-in. |
|
|
09/02 |
Energy Competition Rules Re-adopted with
Amendments. Board reviewed its rules on energy
competition, interim environmental information disclosure standards,
affiliate relations, fair competition and accounting and reporting
standards, and interim government energy aggregation program
standards. |
|
|
04/02 |
Approval of Transfer of PSE&G
Interstate Capacity Contracts to Newco, an Unregulated
Affiliate. Board ruled that Newco can provide the
interstate capacity, storage, and supply needed for PSE&G to
provide basic gas supply service. PSE&G will implement an
optional capacity release program to ensure that third-party
suppliers can obtain capacity to deliver to their customers on
PSE&G's system if needed. The action will move all
nonresidential customers to market-based pricing and provide the
opportunity to consider similar pricing structures for residential
customers. The Division of Ratepayer Advocate had opposed
PSE&G's petition. |
|
|
01/02 |
Board Decides Market Not Yet Ready for
Competitive Basic Gas Supply Service (BGSS).
The
Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act specified that by
January 1, 2002, the Board of Public Utilities must determine whether to make BGSS
available on a competitive basis to any gas supplier, any gas public
utility, or both. In an order (Docket GX01050304) issued on January
17, 2002, the Board declined to order competitive BGSS at this time
but directed the staff to form a gas policy group to examine pricing
and reliability issues that will affect the long-term structure of
BGSS. The Board also decided that interested competitive suppliers and
utilities could pursue implementation of BGSS pilot programs subject
to certain guidelines. These guidelines include use of a 2-year
minimum term, inclusion of at least 25% of residential and small
commercial customers in the pilot, supplier access to interstate
capacity and storage, and uniform pricing for all customers within
the same rate class categories and no
subsidization. |
|