Retail Unbundling - Massachusetts
Status: The state has partially implemented comprehensive unbundling programs for its residential gas customers.
Overview: Massachusetts has used a collaborative effort to develop a program of unbundled retail natural gas service for customers of the 10 investor-owned local distribution companies (LDCs) in the state. Participants in the collaborative include the LDCs, marketers, consumer groups, government agencies, and the state regulatory agency, the Department of Telecommunications and Energy (DTE). In October 2000, the DTE approved final rules governing unbundled services and model terms regarding capacity assignment, default service, and peaking service. These rules specified that LDCs will continue to be responsible for assuring upstream capacity on interstate pipelines for the first 3 years of a 5-year transition period. In the mean time, DTE and the collaborative participants will work out the details of capacity assignment and cost recovery for LDCs as interstate pipeline capacity is shifted to marketers. Statewide unbundling was scheduled to begin in 2000, but as of December 2001, none of the licensed marketers in the state has indicated interest in serving the residential market. Industrial and commercial customers have had a choice of gas suppliers since 1993.
In July 1996, Bay State Gas Company began a pilot program for residential and small business customers. In February 2000, 17,024 of the 83,000 eligible residential customers were participating (21 percent). As of December 2001, however, participation is negligible.
EIA State Data: In 2000, Massachusetts had 1,278,781 residential and 117,993 commercial customers who consumed 114 and 64 billion cubic feet of natural gas, respectively. The average prices paid for natural gas purchased from LDCs by residential and commercial customers were $9.91 and $8.61 per thousand cubic feet, respectively. The average city gate price in the state was $5.43.
Massachusetts: Regulatory and Legislative Actions on Retail Unbundling
Summary: Retail unbundling was scheduled to begin April 1, 2000. On February 1, 1999, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy (DTE) (formerly the Department of Public Utilities) issued Docket 98-32-B, outlining many of the terms and conditions for the retail choice program, including a 5-year transition period. Because DTE found that the upstream, interstate capacity market is not competitive, local distribution companies (LDCs) will retain the responsibility for acquiring interstate pipeline capacity, but the situation will be reviewed after 3 years. The order was the outcome of an industry-wide collaborative process that was initiated by DTE on 7/18/97. Participants in the collaborative include the state's 10 investor-owned LDCs, marketers, consumer groups, government agencies, and the DTE. During the transition period, the DTE and other collaborative participants will work out the details of capacity assignment and cost recovery for LDCs as interstate pipeline capacity is shifted to marketers. Since February 1, 1999, some agreements have been reached and new dockets opened to consider various aspects of the retail choice program.
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
|Regulatory Actions||10/00||DTE Approves Company-Specific Filings for Gas Transportation Service (DTE 98-32-E). These are business rules to govern the administration of customer-choice programs to LDC customers. They also establish procedures for the provision of supplier sales service and LDC distribution and default service.|
|10/00||DTE Adopts Final Rules Governing Natural Gas Unbundling (DTE 98-32-E). (Rules found in section 220 C.M.R §§14.00 et seq.). LDCs are supplier of last resort. Marketers must file articles of incorporation and bylaws with DTE to become an approved supplier. Supplier must give at least 10 days notice before terminating service. Signed and dated request from customer is necessary before supplier can begin service. Marketer cannot require security deposit from customers. Terms of service are to be spelled out clearly, and eligibility for discount rates are to be standardized.|
|2/00||DTE Approves Model Tariff Terms and Conditions re/ Capacity Assignment, Default Service, and Peaking Service (DTE 98-32-D). Companies must submit tariffs within 21 days that comply with approved terms for review by DTE or identify and justify differences. The Collaborative is to file its customer education plan and electronic business transaction report for DTE review.|
|12/99||Proposed Regulations for Unbundled Market. On 12/17/99, DTE opened docket DTE 98-32-E to consider regulations proposed by LDCs to govern unbundled service.|
|11/99||Proposed Model Terms and Conditions. On 11/15/99, DTE opened docket DTE 98-32-D to consider Supplemental Model Terms and Conditions submitted by LDCs. The proposal covers capacity assignment, default service, and peaking service.|
|10/99||Portfolio Auction Contracts. On 10/18/99, DTE approved the 3-year gas supply portfolio auction contract by Boston Gas, Colonial Gas, and Essex Gas. On 10/20/99, DTE approved the 1-year capacity auction of its gas supply resources by Berkshire Gas.|
|4/99||Agreement on Interim Capacity Assumptions. On 4/2/99, DTE approved a settlement agreement concerning interim capacity assumptions. The settlement was designed to facilitate the assignment of capacity costs during the transition to an unbundled market, pending the completion of model terms and conditions, regulations for the unbundled market, interruptible transportation, and an initial assignment of downstream capacity.|
|2/99||Retail Unbundling Order, DTE 98-32-B. The Massachusetts DTE ordered that unbundled gas
services would begin Nov. 1, 1999, under a 5-year transition period. LDCs will remain responsible
for acquiring upstream capacity with review after 3 years. Cost allocation issues will also be
Upstream Capacity Allocation. LDCs must provide "default service" to any customer that does not choose an alternative supplier or returns to the LDC for service. Capacity will be assigned to others through a mandatory assignment mechanism at maximum tariff rates (LDCs annual cost) with LDCs having recall rights. The "migrating" customer will be assigned its pro rata share of upstream pipeline and storage capacity based on its contribution to peak-day demand. Once the capacity is assigned to an alternative supplier, the supplier will have the ability to remarket the capacity and serve its customers with any combination of resources it has available.
Downstream Assets. LDCs must unbundle downstream assets (storage facilities for propane or liquefied natural gas) and make them available to competitors to the extent that operations permit. DTE expects that eventually these assets will be available to marketers on a fully competitive basis.
Portfolio Auction. DTE approved the concept of a portfolio auction whereby LDCs would transfer management of their upstream pipeline capacity, storage, and gas supply commodity contracts to marketers for 3 to 5 years. The auction is not mandatory because DTE could not determine that it would benefit all LDCs. However, any LDC that does not institute such a program must justify its decision to DTE. The Massachusetts Gas Unbundling Collaborative (formed in 1997) was asked to "develop standards concerning wholesale and retail marketers' participation in the market area in connection with the Portfolio Auction" and present them to DTE for review. DTE will review any upstream capacity management program auctioned by an LDC and must approve any auction award prior to implementation.
|11/98||LDC and Marketer Agreement on Model Terms and Conditions for Unbundled Service. DTE approved the settlement agreement concerning model terms and conditions for unbundled gas distribution services proposed on 7/10/98 by the LDCs and the marketer group (<http://www.magnet.state.ma.us/dpu/gas/98-32-a/98-32-a.htm>) The two groups agreed to most sections of the document. By entering into the agreement, both groups agreed that the settlement "shall serve as the basis for LDC compliance filings" and that individual LDCs may propose, and must fully support, any modifications to the settlement made in these filings.|
|7/98||Proposed LDC and Marketer Agreement. The LDCs and the marketer group proposed a settlement agreement concerning model terms and conditions for unbundled gas distribution services. The proposal was docketed as DTE 98-32-A.|
|4/98||Notice of Inquiry into Unresolved Issues of Collaborative. DTE issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) (docket DTE 98-32) in response to unresolved issues in the March 1998 report of the MA Gas Unbundling Collaborative. The NOI encompassed all issues associated with comprehensive unbundling of natural gas services in the state and focused on (1) capacity disposition, both upstream and downstream and (2) associated cost responsibility.|
|3/98||Collaborative Report. The Massachusetts Gas Unbundling Collaborative reported its progress in developing a common set of principles for the comprehensive unbundling of natural gas services in the state <http:www.magnet.state.ma.us/dpu/gasunb.htm>. While consensus was reached on many points, there was no consensus on the disposition of capacity and any associated cost responsibility, and DTE's guidance was requested.|
|7/97||Massachusetts Gas Unbundling Collaborative. The Department of Public Utilities, now the Department of Telecommunications and Energy (DTE), issued "Comprehensive Unbundling of Natural Gas Local Distribution Companies' Services" (<http:www.magnet. state.ma.us/dpu/gasunb.htm>), which directed the state's 10 investor-owned LDCs to initiate an industry-wide collaborative process to develop a common set of principles for the comprehensive unbundling of natural gas services in the state. The Department referred to the principles in its electric restructuring docket (DPU 95-30) as a guide for unbundling in the natural gas industry. As a result of the directive, the LDCs formed the Massachusetts Gas Unbundling Collaborative. One of the LDCs, Bay State Gas Company, had already begun its own collaborative effort related to its company-specific unbundling filing. Other participants were marketers, customer groups, state government agencies, and DTE.|
|Investigative Studies||2/98||Bay State Collaborative Closed. Bay State Gas Company brought its company-specific collaborative process to a close after determining that it would be unable to reach a comprehensive settlement.|
|4/97||Bay State Collaborative Started. Bay State Gas Company began a collaborative to examine unbundling issues related to its pilot project that began in July 1996.|
|Other States||Natural Gas Home Page||Energy Information Administration Home Page:|
File Last modified: 06/19/2002