Table C9. Assumed Rates of Technology Progress for Costs, Drilling Success
Rates, and
Reserve Additions per Well for Lower 48 Natural Gas, 1998-2015
(Percent Improvement per Year)
|
Area of Improvement |
NPC Study |
EIA Study |
|
|
Accelerated Depletion Case |
Reference Case |
||
|
Drilling and Completion Costs |
|||
|
Onshore Wells |
2.5 |
1.29 |
1.29 |
|
Shallow Offshore Wells |
2.5 |
2.02 |
2.02 |
|
Deep Offshore Wells |
3.0 |
2.02 |
2.02 |
|
Unconventional Gas Wells |
2.5 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
|
New Field Exploration Success |
|||
|
Conventional |
1.5 to 2.2 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
|
Unconventionala |
|
0.00 |
0.25 |
|
Reserve Additions per Well |
|||
|
Conventional Onshore |
|||
|
Shallow |
1.0 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
|
Deep |
1.0 |
1.61 |
1.61 |
|
Conventional Offshore |
1.0 |
4.14 |
4.14 |
|
Low Permeability |
2.1 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
|
Unconventional |
1.5 to 3.0 |
0.25 |
0.75 to 1.75 |
|
aCombined exploration and development success for unconventional gas in
the EIA study. Sources: National Petroleum Council, Natural Gas: Meeting the Challenges of the Nations Growing Natural Gas Demand (Washington, DC, December 1999); and Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, National Energy Modeling System runs OGBASE.D051200A and OGDEPL.D051200A. |
|||
![]()
If you would like to received any information relating to any of our reports via e-mail, click on the link labeled "Projections ListServ" to Join by entering your e-mail address.
File last modified: August 18, 2000
URL: http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/depletion/table_c9.html
Need Help
Now?
Call the National
Energy Information Center (NEIC)
(202) 586-8800 9AM - 5PM eastern time