Table C9.  Assumed Rates of Technology Progress for Costs, Drilling Success Rates, and 
Reserve Additions per Well for Lower 48 Natural Gas, 1998-2015
(Percent Improvement per Year)

Area of Improvement

NPC Study

EIA Study

Accelerated Depletion Case

Reference Case

Drilling and Completion Costs

     

  Onshore Wells

2.5

1.29

1.29

  Shallow Offshore Wells

2.5

2.02

2.02

  Deep Offshore Wells

3.0

2.02

2.02

  Unconventional Gas Wells

2.5

0.50

0.50

New Field Exploration Success

     

  Conventional

1.5 to 2.2

0.50

0.50

  Unconventionala

0.00

0.25

Reserve Additions per Well

     

  Conventional Onshore

     

    Shallow

1.0

0.27

0.27

    Deep

1.0

1.61

1.61

  Conventional Offshore

1.0

4.14

4.14

  Low Permeability

2.1

0.25

0.25

  Unconventional

1.5 to 3.0

0.25

0.75 to 1.75

aCombined exploration and development success for unconventional gas in the EIA study.
Sources: National Petroleum Council, Natural Gas: Meeting the Challenges of the Nation’s Growing Natural Gas Demand (Washington, DC, December 1999); and Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, National Energy Modeling System runs OGBASE.D051200A and OGDEPL.D051200A.

Appendix CBack Arrow

 line

If you would like to received any information relating to any of our reports via e-mail, click on the link labeled "Projections ListServ" to Join by entering your e-mail address.

File last modified: August 18, 2000

URL: http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/depletion/table_c9.html

Need Help Now?
Call the National Energy Information Center (NEIC)
(202) 586-8800 9AM - 5PM eastern time