Electric Power Monthly
Data for February 2013 | Release Date: April 22, 2013 | Next Release: May 2013
| full report
Previous Issues
| Table 4.12.A. Average Cost of Petroleum Coke Delivered for Electricity Generation by State, February 2013 and 2012 |
| (Dollars per MMBtu) |
| Census Division and State |
Electric Power Sector | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2013 | February 2012 | Percentage Change | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | |
| New England | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Connecticut | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Maine | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Massachusetts | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| New Hampshire | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Rhode Island | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Vermont | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Middle Atlantic | -- | W | W | -- | -- | -- | W |
| New Jersey | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| New York | -- | W | W | -- | -- | -- | W |
| Pennsylvania | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| East North Central | W | W | W | 1.50 | -- | W | W |
| Illinois | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Indiana | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Michigan | 1.50 | W | W | 1.50 | -- | -- | W |
| Ohio | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| Wisconsin | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| West North Central | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Iowa | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Kansas | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Minnesota | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Missouri | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Nebraska | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| North Dakota | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| South Dakota | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| South Atlantic | 2.48 | 2.67 | -7.1% | 2.48 | 2.67 | -- | -- |
| Delaware | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| District of Columbia | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Florida | 2.48 | 2.67 | -7.1% | 2.48 | 2.67 | -- | -- |
| Georgia | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Maryland | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| North Carolina | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| South Carolina | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Virginia | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| West Virginia | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| East South Central | 1.83 | 1.93 | -5.2% | 1.83 | 1.93 | -- | -- |
| Alabama | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Kentucky | 1.83 | 1.93 | -5.2% | 1.83 | 1.93 | -- | -- |
| Mississippi | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tennessee | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| West South Central | 1.92 | 1.85 | 3.8% | 1.92 | 1.85 | -- | -- |
| Arkansas | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Louisiana | 1.92 | 1.85 | 3.8% | 1.92 | 1.85 | -- | -- |
| Oklahoma | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Texas | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Mountain | -- | W | W | -- | -- | -- | W |
| Arizona | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Colorado | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Idaho | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Montana | -- | W | W | -- | -- | -- | W |
| Nevada | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| New Mexico | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Utah | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Wyoming | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Pacific Contiguous | -- | NM | -- | -- | -- | -- | NM |
| California | -- | NM | -- | -- | -- | -- | NM |
| Oregon | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Washington | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Alaska | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Hawaii | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| U.S. Total | W | W | W | 2.05 | 2.09 | W | W |
| NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Starting in January 2013, there may be a shift in the continuity of Chapter 4 Tables, due to changes in the sample design of Form EIA-923 and the imputation process. See the Instrument Design History section of the Form EIA-923 Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation of these changes. See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |