Electric Power Monthly
Data for February 2013 | Release Date: April 22, 2013 | Next Release: May 2013
| full report
Previous Issues
| Table 4.10.B. Average Cost of Coal Delivered for Electricity Generation by State, (Year-to-Date) February 2013 and 2012 |
| (Dollars per MMBtu) |
| Census Division and State |
Electric Power Sector | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2013 YTD | February 2012 YTD | Percentage Change | February 2013 YTD | February 2012 YTD | February 2013 YTD | February 2012 YTD | |
| New England | 4.01 | 3.58 | 12% | 4.46 | 3.83 | 3.80 | 3.49 |
| Connecticut | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| Maine | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| Massachusetts | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| New Hampshire | 4.46 | 3.83 | 16% | 4.46 | 3.83 | -- | -- |
| Rhode Island | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Vermont | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Middle Atlantic | 2.58 | 2.65 | -2.6% | -- | NM | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| New Jersey | W | 4.06 | W | -- | -- | W | 4.06 |
| New York | W | 3.43 | W | -- | NM | W | 3.42 |
| Pennsylvania | 2.51 | 2.58 | -2.7% | -- | -- | 2.51 | 2.58 |
| East North Central | 2.27 | 2.41 | -5.8% | 2.43 | 2.54 | 1.95 | 2.15 |
| Illinois | 1.88 | 1.96 | -4.1% | 2.14 | 2.10 | 1.85 | 1.94 |
| Indiana | W | W | W | 2.54 | 2.60 | W | W |
| Michigan | 2.92 | W | W | 2.92 | 2.94 | -- | W |
| Ohio | W | W | W | 2.23 | 2.44 | W | W |
| Wisconsin | 2.24 | 2.28 | -1.8% | 2.24 | 2.28 | -- | -- |
| West North Central | 1.77 | 1.71 | 3.5% | 1.77 | 1.71 | -- | -- |
| Iowa | 1.63 | 1.45 | 12% | 1.63 | 1.45 | -- | -- |
| Kansas | 1.84 | 1.81 | 1.7% | 1.84 | 1.81 | -- | -- |
| Minnesota | 2.04 | 1.92 | 6.3% | 2.04 | 1.92 | -- | -- |
| Missouri | 1.92 | 1.86 | 3.2% | 1.92 | 1.86 | -- | -- |
| Nebraska | 1.47 | 1.56 | -5.8% | 1.47 | 1.56 | -- | -- |
| North Dakota | 1.46 | 1.42 | 2.8% | 1.46 | 1.42 | -- | -- |
| South Dakota | 2.07 | 2.51 | -18% | 2.07 | 2.51 | -- | -- |
| South Atlantic | 3.26 | 3.34 | -2.4% | 3.38 | 3.43 | 2.75 | 2.98 |
| Delaware | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| District of Columbia | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Florida | 3.43 | W | W | 3.43 | 3.48 | -- | W |
| Georgia | 3.34 | 3.58 | -6.7% | 3.34 | 3.58 | -- | -- |
| Maryland | W | 3.55 | W | -- | -- | W | 3.55 |
| North Carolina | 3.88 | 3.76 | 3.2% | 3.88 | 3.78 | -- | 3.14 |
| South Carolina | 3.84 | W | W | 3.84 | 4.00 | -- | W |
| Virginia | W | W | W | 3.51 | 3.71 | W | W |
| West Virginia | 2.54 | 2.46 | 3.3% | 2.78 | 2.56 | 2.11 | 2.24 |
| East South Central | W | W | W | 2.57 | 2.67 | W | W |
| Alabama | 2.80 | W | W | 2.80 | 2.95 | -- | W |
| Kentucky | 2.38 | 2.43 | -2.1% | 2.38 | 2.43 | -- | -- |
| Mississippi | W | W | W | 4.27 | 4.27 | W | W |
| Tennessee | 2.51 | 2.67 | -6.0% | 2.51 | 2.67 | -- | -- |
| West South Central | 2.10 | 2.15 | -2.3% | 2.26 | 2.06 | 1.89 | 2.27 |
| Arkansas | W | W | W | 2.44 | 2.03 | W | W |
| Louisiana | W | W | W | 2.94 | 2.69 | W | W |
| Oklahoma | W | W | W | 2.04 | 2.01 | W | W |
| Texas | 1.98 | 2.16 | -8.3% | 2.17 | 1.97 | 1.85 | 2.31 |
| Mountain | W | 1.83 | W | 1.91 | 1.89 | W | 1.35 |
| Arizona | 2.04 | 2.07 | -1.4% | 2.04 | 2.07 | -- | -- |
| Colorado | 1.89 | W | W | 1.89 | 1.88 | -- | W |
| Idaho | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Montana | W | W | W | -- | 1.50 | W | W |
| Nevada | W | W | W | 2.94 | 2.66 | W | W |
| New Mexico | 2.30 | 2.19 | 5.0% | 2.30 | 2.19 | -- | -- |
| Utah | 2.01 | W | W | 2.01 | 1.94 | -- | W |
| Wyoming | 1.50 | W | W | 1.50 | 1.52 | -- | W |
| Pacific Contiguous | W | 2.20 | W | 1.91 | 1.88 | W | 2.41 |
| California | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| Oregon | 1.91 | 1.88 | 1.6% | 1.91 | 1.88 | -- | -- |
| Washington | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | W | W | W | -- | 1.68 | W | W |
| Alaska | -- | W | W | -- | 1.68 | -- | W |
| Hawaii | W | W | W | -- | -- | W | W |
| U.S. Total | 2.33 | 2.40 | -2.9% | 2.38 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.39 |
| NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Starting in January 2013, there may be a shift in the continuity of Chapter 4 Tables, due to changes in the sample design of Form EIA-923 and the imputation process. See the Instrument Design History section of the Form EIA-923 Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation of these changes. See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |