Electric Power Monthly
Data for February 2013 | Release Date: April 22, 2013 | Next Release: May 2013
| full report
Previous Issues
| Table 4.7.A. Receipts of Petroleum Liquids Delivered for Electricity Generation by State, February 2013 and 2012 |
| (Thousand Barrels) |
| Electric Power Sector | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Census Division and State |
All Sectors | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers | Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||
| February 2013 | February 2012 | Percentage Change | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | |
| New England | 328 | NM | NM | 2 | NM | 325 | NM | 0 | NM | 0.10 | 25 |
| Connecticut | 69 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 69 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Maine | 154 | 27 | 477% | 0 | NM | 153 | NM | 0 | NM | 0.10 | 23 |
| Massachusetts | 82 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 82 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| New Hampshire | 2 | NM | NM | 2 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Rhode Island | 20 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 20 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Vermont | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Middle Atlantic | 231 | 261 | -11% | 32 | 113 | 194 | 123 | 0 | NM | 5 | NM |
| New Jersey | 14 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 14 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| New York | 190 | 206 | -8.0% | 32 | 113 | 153 | 73 | 0 | NM | 5 | NM |
| Pennsylvania | 26 | 47 | -44% | 0 | NM | 26 | 45 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| East North Central | 71 | 92 | -23% | 54 | 72 | 14 | 14 | 0 | NM | 3 | 5 |
| Illinois | 8 | 14 | -42% | 1 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Indiana | 10 | 22 | -53% | 10 | 20 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Michigan | 22 | 19 | 17% | 20 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 2 | 1 |
| Ohio | 25 | 28 | -13% | 17 | 23 | 7 | 5 | 0 | NM | 1 | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 5 | 9 | -38% | 5 | 8 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0.36 | NM |
| West North Central | 32 | 54 | -41% | 32 | 52 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Iowa | 6 | 14 | -57% | 6 | 14 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Kansas | 10 | 13 | -26% | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 1 | NM | NM | 1 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Missouri | 10 | 16 | -40% | 10 | 16 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Nebraska | 2 | NM | NM | 2 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 4 | 7 | -42% | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| South Dakota | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| South Atlantic | 130 | 274 | -52% | 79 | 126 | 26 | NM | 0 | NM | 25 | 109 |
| Delaware | 2 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florida | 10 | NM | NM | 10 | 10 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Georgia | 16 | 47 | -67% | 8 | 23 | 4 | NM | 0 | NM | 4 | 25 |
| Maryland | 19 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 19 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 1 |
| North Carolina | 12 | 62 | -81% | 12 | 30 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 31 |
| South Carolina | 24 | 64 | -62% | 8 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 16 | 24 |
| Virginia | 39 | 46 | -15% | 34 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 0.36 | 4 | NM |
| West Virginia | 8 | 19 | -56% | 8 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East South Central | 85 | 45 | 89% | 85 | 26 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Alabama | 10 | 21 | -53% | 10 | 5 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Kentucky | 17 | 15 | 17% | 17 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Tennessee | 58 | 8 | 667% | 58 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| West South Central | 15 | 20 | -23% | 5 | NM | 10 | 15 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Arkansas | 3 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Louisiana | 4 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Oklahoma | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | 9 | 12 | -24% | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Mountain | 21 | 45 | -53% | 21 | 43 | 1 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Arizona | 9 | 7 | 17% | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Colorado | 0.35 | NM | NM | 0.35 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Idaho | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Montana | 0.28 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 0.28 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 1 | 1 | -13% | 0.48 | NM | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 4 | 20 | -77% | 4 | 19 | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Utah | 3 | NM | NM | 3 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 4 | 9 | -58% | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM |
| Pacific Contiguous | 2 | 29 | -92% | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| California | 0 | 14 | -100% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Oregon | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Washington | 2 | NM | NM | 0 | NM | 2 | NM | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | 841 | 953 | -12% | 697 | 775 | 144 | 134 | 0 | NM | 0 | 43 |
| Alaska | 0 | 133 | -100% | 0 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0 | NM |
| Hawaii | 841 | 820 | 2.5% | 697 | 651 | 144 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| U.S. Total | 1,755 | 1,822 | -3.6% | 1,007 | 1,218 | 716 | 350 | 0 | NM | 33 | 240 |
| NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Notes: Starting in January 2013, there may be a shift in the continuity of Chapter 4 Tables, due to changes in the sample design of Form EIA-923 and the imputation process. See the Instrument Design History section of the Form EIA-923 Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation of these changes. See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |
