Electric Power Monthly
Data for February 2013 | Release Date: April 22, 2013 | Next Release: May 2013
| full report
Previous Issues
| Table 2.6.A. Consumption of Petroleum Liquids for Electricity Generation by State, by Sector, February 2013 and February 2012 |
| (Thousand Barrels) |
| Electric Power Sector | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Census Division and State |
All Sectors | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers | Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||
| February 2013 | February 2012 | Percentage Change | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | |
| New England | 366 | 33 | NM | 60 | 4 | 295 | 22 | NM | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Connecticut | 110 | 8 | NM | 1 | NM | 109 | 7 | NM | 0 | NM | NM |
| Maine | 109 | 15 | 648% | NM | NM | 108 | 11 | NM | NM | NM | 3 |
| Massachusetts | 87 | 6 | NM | 23 | 1 | 60 | 4 | NM | NM | 2 | NM |
| New Hampshire | 37 | NM | NM | 35 | 1 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Rhode Island | 21 | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 19 | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Vermont | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Middle Atlantic | 178 | 58 | 207% | 95 | 6 | 72 | 44 | NM | NM | NM | 7 |
| New Jersey | NM | 3 | NM | NM | NM | 11 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| New York | 134 | 33 | 303% | 94 | 6 | 28 | 20 | NM | NM | 8 | 6 |
| Pennsylvania | 33 | 22 | 54% | NM | NM | 33 | 21 | 0.30 | NM | NM | 0.30 |
| East North Central | 76 | 85 | -10% | 62 | 68 | 12 | 14 | NM | 0.40 | 2 | 2 |
| Illinois | 6 | 12 | -46% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | NM | 0.10 | NM | NM |
| Indiana | 16 | 22 | -24% | 15 | 20 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 1 |
| Michigan | NM | 18 | NM | 14 | 17 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0.25 | 1 | 1 |
| Ohio | 34 | 29 | 21% | 28 | 22 | 6 | 7 | NM | NM | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Wisconsin | 4 | 5 | -29% | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| West North Central | 35 | 46 | -23% | 34 | 44 | NM | 1 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Iowa | 8 | 12 | -35% | 8 | 12 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Kansas | 6 | 6 | -8.3% | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota | NM | 5 | NM | NM | 4 | NM | 1 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Missouri | 11 | 11 | -1.7% | 11 | 11 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Nebraska | 2 | 4 | -51% | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 4 | 4 | 6.1% | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| South Dakota | 3 | 3 | -5.9% | 3 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| South Atlantic | 170 | 209 | -19% | 129 | 141 | 22 | 51 | NM | NM | 19 | 16 |
| Delaware | NM | 2 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florida | 53 | 47 | 12% | 51 | 41 | NM | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Georgia | 18 | 23 | -21% | 7 | 11 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 11 | 10 |
| Maryland | 17 | 12 | 48% | NM | 1 | 17 | 10 | NM | NM | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| North Carolina | 35 | 36 | -3.2% | 34 | 35 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 1 |
| South Carolina | 16 | 26 | -38% | 15 | 24 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 1 | 2 |
| Virginia | 13 | 42 | -69% | 6 | 8 | 2 | 32 | NM | 0.08 | 5 | 2 |
| West Virginia | 15 | 22 | -30% | 15 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East South Central | 67 | 56 | 19% | 63 | 53 | NM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Alabama | 13 | 10 | 41% | 10 | 7 | NM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Kentucky | 24 | 15 | 60% | 24 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 2 | 1 | 41% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.35 | 0.01 |
| Tennessee | 27 | 30 | -9.4% | 27 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| West South Central | 19 | 20 | -6.1% | 6 | 7 | 12 | 11 | NM | NM | 1 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 4 | 3 | 52% | 2 | NM | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | NM | 0.37 |
| Louisiana | 4 | 5 | -12% | NM | NM | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Oklahoma | NM | 2 | NM | NM | 2 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | 10 | 10 | -0.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Mountain | 27 | 30 | -9.9% | 24 | 28 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Arizona | 7 | 6 | 26% | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Colorado | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Idaho | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Montana | 2 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 1 | 1 | 15% | 1 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 7 | 6 | 9.3% | 7 | 6 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Utah | 6 | 4 | 31% | 6 | 4 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 3 | 8 | -68% | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Pacific Contiguous | 9 | 19 | -54% | NM | 5 | 2 | 6 | NM | NM | 1 | 9 |
| California | 4 | 10 | -56% | 4 | 4 | 0.16 | 6 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| Oregon | NM | 1 | NM | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 |
| Washington | 4 | 9 | -59% | NM | NM | 2 | NM | NM | NM | 1 | 8 |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | 850 | 1,011 | -16% | 742 | 906 | 101 | 85 | NM | NM | 6 | 19 |
| Alaska | 83 | 119 | -31% | 78 | 112 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 4 | 7 |
| Hawaii | 767 | 892 | -14% | 664 | 794 | 101 | 85 | 1 | 0.08 | NM | 12 |
| U.S. Total | 1,797 | 1,567 | 15% | 1,222 | 1,263 | 519 | 238 | NM | 6 | 45 | 60 |
| Notes: See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |
