Electric Power Monthly
Data for February 2013 | Release Date: April 22, 2013 | Next Release: May 2013
| full report
Previous Issues
| Table 1.11.A. Net Generation from Other Gases |
| by State, by Sector, February 2013 and 2012 (Thousand Megawatthours) |
| Electric Power Sector | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Census Division and State |
All Sectors | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers |
Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||
| February 2013 | February 2012 | Percentage Change |
February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | February 2013 | February 2012 | |
| New England | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maine | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Massachusetts | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rhode Island | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vermont | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Middle Atlantic | 66 | 79 | -17.4% | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 63 | 75 |
| New Jersey | 14 | 17 | -19.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 13 | 17 |
| New York | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 52 | 62 | -16.9% | 0 | 0 | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 49 | 58 |
| East North Central | 239 | 277 | -13.7% | 0 | 0 | 26 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 213 | 246 |
| Illinois | 28 | 34 | -17.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 34 |
| Indiana | 170 | 191 | -11.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 191 |
| Michigan | 25 | 29 | -11.2% | 0 | 0 | 25 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ohio | 16 | 23 | -31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| West North Central | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Iowa | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kansas | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Missouri | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nebraska | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Dakota | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| South Dakota | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Atlantic | 8 | 38 | -79.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 38 |
| Delaware | 5 | 16 | -70.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 |
| District of Columbia | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florida | 1 | 1 | -16.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Georgia | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryland | 0 | 19 | -100.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| North Carolina | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Virginia | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| West Virginia | 3 | 3 | 2.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| East South Central | 22 | 31 | -28.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 31 |
| Alabama | 21 | 30 | -29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 30 |
| Kentucky | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tennessee | 1 | 1 | 17.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| West South Central | 293 | 362 | -19.2% | 0 | 0 | 120 | 162 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 200 |
| Arkansas | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 117 | 114 | 2.3% | 0 | 0 | 20 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 90 |
| Oklahoma | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | 176 | 248 | -29.1% | 0 | 0 | 100 | 139 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 109 |
| Mountain | 27 | 31 | -13.8% | 0 | 0 | 0.38 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 30 |
| Arizona | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Colorado | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Idaho | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Montana | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10.6% | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 0.37 | 1 | -42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0.37 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Utah | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Wyoming | 24 | 28 | -12.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 28 |
| Pacific Contiguous | 143 | 178 | -19.5% | NM | NM | 27 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 116 | 143 |
| California | 116 | 144 | -19.2% | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 116 | 143 |
| Oregon | 0 | 0 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Washington | 27 | 33 | -20.5% | 0 | 0 | 27 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pacific Noncontiguous | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Alaska | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| Hawaii | NM | NM | NM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NM | NM |
| U.S. Total | 804 | 1,005 | -20.0% | NM | NM | 176 | 232 | NM | NM | 627 | 771 |
| NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. Notes: See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. Negative generation denotes that electric power consumed for plant use exceeds gross generation. Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. Percentage change is calculated before rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |
